When Stephen hawking meets the lovely lovely daughter of the great great Brian Greene in an alternative universe to travel into a black hole and possibly discover a new theory of black holes

When Stephen hawking meets the lovely lovely daughter of the great great Brian Greene in an alternative universe to travel into a black hole and possibly discover a new theory of black holes:

Be advised. Text contains hard graphics :)

And so our great great story of imaginary science continues through the fabric of the multiverse. Some say that due to some intense quantum disturbances waving in between infinities, the spaceship that holds the big Higgs event has entered a random black hole and ended up specifically where a past choice was made by one of the spaceship occupants. All the passengers onboard the spaceship are amazed to see such random outcome. They all awaits now for Brian Greene’s beautiful daughter to begin her speech:

Her: professor Stephen hawking, as you may know, a black hole event in spacetime is also a physical point of no return, and you should also consider that a theory of black holes could be a unified field equation which applies to all theories of nature. Where nature has complex systems then nature will always have theoretic points of no return which will grow theoretic black holes and eat up all imprinted memories eventually. The theory of a singularity tells us that energy can come in existence from nowhere in spacetime, so a singularity event would also suggest that energy can be erased the same way it is created, therefore a black hole should be allowed to erase information completely from the vacuum of spacetime to counterbalance the spontaneous creation of vacuum energy. If a black hole is a singularity event inside the vacuum of spacetime, then a black hole should be allowed to produce vacuum permanent collapse. So I warn you, think twice before stepping inside my imaginarium singularity event

Stephen: I don’t know what to say. I have already lost the battle of memory preservation inside a black hole

Her: why not try a second time? We have nothing to loose after all, it’s just a new idea which can be right or wrong

Stephen: ok. Take me into your big Higgs event and let’s see if you can imagine things better than me

Her: as you wish, but I’m warning you, it’s nothing you’ve ever imagined before

Stephen: try me

Her: wish granted. In order to start our imaginary journey we need two things: a spaceship made of black hole material and a quantum tunneling event

Stephen: you’re telling me a black hole is made of some material substance?

Her: yea. Why not. It’s after all something which lives in our material reality, it should be made of some material stuff

Stephen: right

Her: pick a black hole

Stephen: The one at the center of our Milky Way

Her: wish granted. And we are there.

Stephen: obviously I can’t make any physical observation, I live inside your imagination. You have to describe me what I see

Her: true :)

Stephen: so what do I see?

Her: you see a bright light at the center of the Milky Way.

Stephen: :) What more?

Her: as we pass by it we see old giant stars dancing fast around the black hole. We are now inside its inner solar system. No planet can be formed here as it is rapidly destroyed due to a massive gravitational pull. Only super Suns can stand tall and bleed in front of a black hole

Stephen: and what’s the outer solar system of the black hole?

Her: the entire Milky Way. Our galaxy is the gravitational field of a supper massive black hole

Stephen: then dark matter should be directly related to the mass of the black hole

Her: precisely. It’s more gravity than we can measure according to general relativity and quantum theory. It is an ancient density field which was invented in spacetime before the Higgs field came into existence, it’s a new density event

Stephen: interesting. And how does a black hole interacts with the Higgs field?

Her: the Higgs field relates its energy via gravity directly to the density of the black hole and the black hole relates its density directly to random vacuum fluctuations in spacetime, therefore the Higgs communicates indirectly with the vacuum of spacetime using black holes

Stephen: and why does spacetime need a black hole? Why not a direct Higgs-vacuum relation?

Her: all physical density in spacetime is directly related to vacuum energy eventually. If the Higgs is directly related to all vacuum energy in spacetime, then all vacuum energy becomes infinitely dense in relation to the Higgs field, therefore all spacetime suddenly becomes infinitely dense and eventually collapses. So you need a special tool, like a black hole event in spacetime, to allow a vacuum field to measure itself in the first place and then measure its potential density in relation to all other physical fields descended from its random fluctuations

Stephen: And why does a black hole need a two set of solar systems?

Her: it’s a two set of unstable fluctuating systems. The black hole is a single giant vacuum event suspended in spacetime. The inner solar system resembles more of an atomic system as you get near the black hole event while the rest of the Galaxy becomes more relative as you get further away from the black hole event. A black hole event should unify the vacuum of spacetime with quantum theory and general relativity so it must have a spacetime transition phase across its entire local field in spacetime which describes a galaxy event

Stephen: interesting. Go on

Her: as we get closer to the event horizon general relativity is the first theory which brakes apart due to contradictory observation

Stephen: please explain

Her: general relativity is diverted into an infinite system of measurement in relation to special relativity. An object can’t reach the speed of light if it has mass. So in between light limit and our imaginary spaceship Zeno paradox applies and spacetime is allowed to subdivide infinitely. Because the event horizon has a spin close to light speed, then it is impossible for our spaceship to reach it in relative spacetime as the event horizon behaves like a turtle which has a head start equivalent to the point of black hole birth. No matter how close we get to it we can’t reach it

Stephen: and how can we escape Zeno paradox?

Her: we have to loose our gravitational engine, we have to become energy. You’re the captain. You do that

Stephen: ok. Releasing all gravitational mass now

Her: and time has stopped instantly

Stephen: and what do we see?

Her: we see spacetime becoming a static wave transmission, we see disconnected regions of space, we see Bohr rings, we see quantum mechanics invading our visual horizon

Stephen: and how do we see relative spacetime in relation to us?

Her: light speed becomes a static frame of reference, it becomes a new measuring tool also as it turns out time turns against us. We make one light speed jump ahead and only then all relative things are allowed to change in relation to us. We become the first players allowed by the game of spacetime to make a move. We also see the future, we see Planck dimension. We see everything evolving only at Planck rates and therefore we can only walk, as a wave, if we jump on random Planck stairs, like two innocent kids who doesn’t care about reality

Stephen: cool. Are we ready now to land on the surface of the black hole?

Her: yea, be sure of that

Stephen: me first :)

Her: after you sir. Oh, we’re going to land there for the first time in human imagination. How do you feel?

Stephen: lucky?

Her: and now we are allowed to move first towards the event horizon and then the event horizon is allowed to make a Planck spin in relation to us. We see it like a giant Planck wheel now. As we touch it like two astronaut particles, we encounter the second great wave of theory braking. Now quantum theory is canceled

Stephen: can’t wait to imagine that. Please explain

Her: at light speed there’s no quantum uncertainty principle applying to the vacuum field in relation to us if we are photons. We can see virtual particles happening right within our physical reach. We’re photons. We learn first how to arise from it, how to master its potential random memory and build us, greater things. We also become independent observers to all physical motion because we are allowed to observe the mechanical tick of time. It is a Planck tick. And with a Planck tick we see the entire spin sequence of all quantum nature as quantum nature relates to us in the form of a classical mechanical clock now. Therefore we see particles independent from their associate waves although they can’t move independently from their associate waves. Because waves moves at light speed inside a vacuum, as we jump between Planck bits, first we see waves moving in relation to light speed and then we see particles moving according to their associate waves. If particles have zero mass then particles are always influenced by their associate waves. If particles have mass then they both influences one another. However, our wave is always perfectly synchronized with our physical position in relation to virtual particles giving us free access to modify all the Planck bits that we hold inside

Stephen: I see that particles becomes like physical objects and waves becomes their spatial frame of reference, like gravity

Her: yea. But let’s not forget that even waves must have their associate particle. They must be made of something, something which predicts a general profile of particle formation and particle decay.

Stephen: and what’s that profile?

Her: if nature has two types of particles, particles that have zero mass and particles that have some mass, then there should also be unstable particles which remains waves and particles which becomes stable constructs

Stephen: so what do we discover on the surface of the black hole?

She: we discover that the event horizon of the black hole is actually capable of measuring the behavior of one Planck bit per spin in any given direction and therefore it is capable of achieving a Planck levitating wheel or field which can perfectly separate two regions of vacuum energy. We learn how to spin the vacuum

Stephen: are you telling me that a black hole is a giant levitating Planck field?

Her: precisely

Stephen: and what’s the physical consistency of a black hole?

Her: it’s like a region of Planck rings, rings which conducts vacuum energy like a classical transistor

Stephen: are you telling me a black hole is like a giant computer?

Her: precisely. It’s a vacuum computer which can accurately measure its physical volume in relation to other random vacuum fluctuations. Because random vacuum bits accidentally creates nature, this computer software acts like a primordial quantum worm profile which erases random memory clusters or physical forces so it can keep counting itself while at the same time resetting the bits of spacetime which can reshape new memory. So a black hole destroys physical information only to conserve empty vacuum volume which can be rewritten. But, like all quantum computers in our reality, it also has a restricted random error sequence related to light speed always and to vacuum absolute annihilation, one which tells that the computer could gain or loose forever some of its entropy only at random mathematics per constant measurement

Stephen: then what’s the outcome of a black hole field equation?

Her: you get twice the energy of a vacuum field and therefore twice the energy of the entire universe but with some random costs or loss

Stephen: Is it a theory of everything?

Her: it’s not a theory of everything. However, it is a theory of all known physical forces. All physical forces are compressed within a tiny field on which I walk and which is also the event horizon of my black hole event

Stephen: what’s the physical outcome of all known forces behaving as one?

Her: pick one force

Stephen: gravity

Her: gravity is produced equivalent to all physical forces put together

Stephen: so it measures more physical mass than we can possibly predict

Her: precisely. It’s an efficient engine

Stephen: then we have no dark matter

Her: yea

Stephen: so what’s a singularity event?

Her: let’s try a thought experiment. I am Planck living on a Planck surface and you are Stephen, you live on earth and you hold me in your hand. I foresee your future always and you always foresee my past. I am allowed to see the future outcome of all reality while you are allowed to see the past outcome of all reality. As it turns out, we’re both connected via quantum entanglements if we both touch a black hole event horizon

Stephen: cool thought experiment

Her: yea

Stephen: it’s expensive to beat Leonard susskind at memory tests

Her: why’s that?

Hawking: it costs all dark matter in the universe :)


The short unified field story of the professor:

In regards to such minimum theory assumption, Stephen hawking and Brian Greene’s wonderful daughter have devised a simple rational thought experiment which could be eventually the summary of a unified field theory. Let’s call it the theory of the professor who always studies the physics of the momentum using random math:

Say you have a professor and he has a functional theory. His theory works with nature in such way that it gives no error in return. Eventually his theory becomes a geometric shape, say a sphere, in which the professor gets trapped and from which it is free to experiment on his idea with greater volumes which could sustain his fluid density. And physics says that when you’re trapped inside a spacetime bubble, when you’re a universe, and you’re at free fall inside the vacuum of spacetime, the only thing you’ll notice coming your way is vacuum energy, random bits of information interfering with your theory across your theoretic surface. Physics also say that spacetime is unstable and if you don’t do something about it you’ll never become stable reality. Common sense tells you that a symmetry theory or an ordered state theory can’t be joined permanently with a random state theory as they will eventually end up canceling each other. So the only thing the professor can do in order to join forces is actually two things: he can add an extra random mathematical layer which he can control and which can become partially stable in relation to vacuum randomness, or he must learn how to master infinity. For no mathematical reason the professor always chooses to add an extra layer of apparently random knowledge, always. So now the professor has this random shield which protects his theory from physical collapse, but the random shield can’t protect him for eternity. In order to make his theory bigger in spacetime, the professor also needs a laser gun to aim and soot at random bits which attack his theory shield. Because he’s not allowed to spin faster than light inside his theory, the professor still can’t control the overall decay sequence of the entire theory surface, therefore his lucky chance remains hidden within a last random mathematical sequence that he can’t physically control nor predict. If, by lucky chance, some last unpredictable random math coming from outside the theory matches exactly the random bits of the protecting wave event or shielding property, then we can say that our professor has gained an extra unit of spacetime in relation to eternity. If not, then he has lost one step against eternity. If the professor advances his theory into a black hole, then the professor becomes like Stephen hawking and shoots his famous laser gun theory to stop the random vacuum from eating up his black hole spaceship which has become an ordered state of vacuum computation. Every time he shoots enemy random bits coming in contact with his theory he obtains a radiation event.

And the professor has 3 shooting phases or radiation events always:

When he shoots symmetry phase he maintains the stability of his theory and also preserves the information about his theory. This means he absorbs and gives away equal amounts of radiation.

When he shoots mirror phase he maintains the stability of his theory but he losses information about his theory in accordance to the shooting event. The mirror event says the professor gives away some of his information while producing twice as much radiation than a symmetry event.

And then there’s a third unknown and uncontrollable shooting phase in spacetime which applies to all predictable or stable theories, and which says that any stable theory looses or gains information at random events inversely related to the entropy which describes the theory and proportional to vacuum constant speed. The closer you are in relation to light speed, the less random events happens and vice versa. And that’s also the second arrow of time. And the second arrow of time says that the slower you move in relation to light speed the more random your physical nature becomes and vice versa.

In the end it all depends on the lucky chance that the professor has. Even if he masters spacetime and lives inside a black hole he will still have to fight the inevitable outcome of random information which accidentally builds or destroys his theory. And as Peter Higgs would say, if you can control gravity with mass, then you should also control mass with gravity, so why not controlling vacuum energy with mass and gravity?

And if such story is true, then there should always be 3 general theory braking points in spacetime: a symmetry braking point, a mirror braking point and a random braking point. Even photons should share these 3 braking points in the theory of light speed as photons are always related to vacuum random fluctuation.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

when Michio Kaku meets Brian Greene’s lovely daughter in an alternative universe to discuss the theory of all human theories, the theory of the human mind

when Michio Kaku meets Brian Greene’s lovely daughter in an alternative universe to discuss the theory of all human theories, the theory of the human mind:

It’s late and their meeting was already delayed by some unpredictable gravitational tides waving through the multiverse. They’re like two strangers in a Schrödinger’s box. We have no idea if they’re actually talking. Hold on. We have the transmission:

She: mr Michio Kaku, before we start, I have to tell you a short story about my electromagnetic gravity. It is the birth place of my imagination

Michio: I have plenty of listenings

She: It is a story you’ll love best because it’s only about particles, waves, or particle-wave interference. It is a 3 set mathematical equation which has 3 rules only. They also define 3 ways of measuring any physical system. You know, a wave is like a wave and a particle is like a particle. A wave is like a foldable paper and a particle is like a folded paper. If particles attracts in relation to waves, then waves rejects in relation to waves and particles rejects in relation to particles. When a particle, say a photon, passes within the physical range (radius) of a wave, the wave interferes with the particle by curving around it using electromagnetic property, shielding the particle from observation in all physical geometrical planes. When another photon particle shielded by its associate wave comes on a direct collision course, their waves interferes first in spacetime by opening in relation to one another. As photons get closer in relation to one another their associate waves becomes less and less curved surfaces as particles eventually make physical contact. And that’s a permanent behavior. Be it measured or not. You also call this particle to particle permanent interaction a physical field formation which possesses gravitational waving quality, the curvature of spacetime. Gravity is a product of multiple wave interference. Unlike my electromagnetic eggshell, conventional gravity works at different frequency, one which is directly related to physical mass, resulting it’s also a much denser substance than electromagnetic gravity but still has symmetric geometry. In the end, you are free to choose what to observe: the particle, the wave, or both.

Michio: and what is a wave then?

Her: minimum geometry at constant physical rest

Michio: and what is spacetime to you?

Her: an inverse square relation between symmetric geometry at rest

Michio: interesting. What else?

Her: the rest you already know

Michio: right

Her: do you believe in God professor?

Michio: I don’t know what to say. Do you?

Her: yes. It’s an inevitable outcome of nature

Michio: please explain

Her: God is a general connection across spacetime, be it direct or indirect, which connects two distant regions of spacetime instantly. God applies not only in space, but also in time.

Michio: are you trying to tell me that God is quantum entanglement?

Her: precisely

Michio: and what do you think is the absolute power of God?

Her: knowledge, information about physical systems

Michio: and what does God wishes to achieve?

Her: to connect evolving species across history. To learn of their discoveries. To build immortal architecture which eventually attracts and creates social evolution or social events across vast distances of time, time which is not in human favor

Michio: is God a written word?

Her: only if it’s written via quantum entanglements

Michio: and how can a written word describe quantum entanglements?

Her: it describes a logic stable sequence which can only be achieved when using diverse states of intellectual processes which are of unstable nature. Once achieved such quality of knowledge, then regardless of relative time passings in physical space, the written system remains a constant action-reaction piece, a sequence of information that once uploaded in any Darwinian mechanical system starting with genes and ending with brains, it changes the entire construct producing the same outcome, like in quantum nature

Michio: Please explain how quantum entanglements hold the entire written architecture of a functional Darwinian brain

Her: quantum entanglements can have two ways of system government: it can have direct implication or indirect implication therefore it can create infinite complexity or entropy, and therefore sustain the mechanics of a human mind, a human brain, or the entire sequence of spacetime

Michio: is entropy a thinking brain then?

Her: more or less

Michio: does entropy explain human imagination?

Her: no

Michio: then what is human imagination?

Her: it describes a partial or complete collapse of any entropic system once the system is measured

Michio: so, when I imagine, I actually try to measure my intellectual ability?

Her: precisely

Michio: please describe how you measure yourself

Her: the human mind has some chemical stimuli which holds its architecture. When you allow imagination you also allow malware systems which originates within your long term memory parameters to hack, to excite, and therefore to change your thinking stimuli or thinking architecture. Therefore the mind can collapse completely or it can suffer partial mutations under the mechanical stress of imagination depending on its physical strength

Michio: so what is the general profile of imagination in spacetime if reality is a thinking theory?

Her: the physical ability to distort spacetime in such way that it created the mathematical illusion of infinity, of parallel infinite worlds

Michio: does parallel worlds truly exist then?

Her: do you think I can exist only in the form of imagination?

Michio: probably not

Her: we have to get out of the Schrödinger’s box. We have a gravitational tsunami heading towards our location in spacetime

Michio: my dear Brian, you have such a lovely daughter. We should be doing this more often. Let’s call professor Stephen hawking and continue our big Higgs social event

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

When Neil deGrasse Tyson meets Brian Greene’s daughter in an alternative universe to discuss the mechanics of a black hole

When Neil deGrasse Tyson meets Brian Greene’s daughter in an alternative universe to discuss the mechanics of a black hole:

Can you imagine that? :) who cares! let’s try it. Imagination comes in free speeches

And so the story goes that after Brian Greene is satisfied with the ideas of his wonderful daughter and her imaginary friend on electromagnetic gravity, a concept which doesn’t exist yet in our physical reality, he calls Neil Tyson to set up a meeting during his famous cosmos tv adventures. And so they end up having the greatest chat of their entire lifetime experience. And their famous tv show goes viral in all possible imagined parallel universes in the form of some mysterious frequency event, some weird energy which upsets all the world’s scientific telescopes.

The tv show:

Neil: look at this wonderful re creative black hole event. What do you see?

She: I see nothing!

Some say even professor Lawrence Krauss is in the back door audience.

Neil: why? Why do you see nothing?

She: I see nothing because I can’t see something. The spatial diameter of a black hole has zero relative time across.

Neil: then what about the theory of a black hole? What could be driving its mechanics?

She: there is no theory. There’s only the energy of nothing holding its entire physical volume. So I can only think of Planck mechanics. It is a region of nothing pushing in all direction at an equivalent force rate to Casimir mechanics.

And now Lawrence k smiles in the audience.

Neil: and if you were to enter a black hole? What’s there to find?

She: absolutely zero quantum mechanics and absolutely zero relativity. No physical force is allowed to live inside. There’s spacetime at perfect balance.

Neil: so what keeps the black hole from not falling apart?

She: I imagine it like a giant single quantum unit or electromagnetic field particle. All physical forces are only allowed to express themselves freely outside the event horizon and therefore outside the equation of the black hole

Neil: there was no equation

She: nothing could be an equivalent equation in physics, nothing could be a sparticle

Neil: and how does your nothing sparticle works?

She: in accordance with accepted science

Neil: and how is that?

She: well, starting with the event horizon limit, physical forces start their regular count. The event horizon becomes then the first known physical field in nature, the weak force. Then you get strong force, then electromagnetism, and finally general relativity. So they all hold together the equation of nothing, like a parallel physical shield.

Neil: then what about Hawking radiation?

She: to me it looks like a wonder belt. You get to destroy and create new particles, you get a free quantum collision in spacetime, like CERN.

Neil: and what about the Higgs field? What do you think?

She: it’s like a big brother Higgs field. It’s not something we can measure according to our known theories. It produces dark matter in the curvature of spacetime. It’s a new theory, a new thing.

Neil: and what is big Higgs to you?

She: just some singularity substance, something which is not gravity nor physical mass.

Neil: and why is a black hole unstable? I mean varying in volume depending on how much it eats from our reality?

She: because a black hole resembles overall a weak decay.

Neil: ok. Tell me what do you know about quantum waves, you’re so called electromagnetic gravity

She: that’s a complete new theory of gravity. It’s like an elastic sheet of material on which you can’t sit stable, it constantly reacts to your physical body pushing you up. It’s like a playground for kids.

Neil: great talk!

Girl: thanks


Some say that Michio Kaku is on his way to meet the daughter of Brian Greene and also Stephen hawking got interested in this latest news. All we know he’s called the big Higgs social event.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The big Higgs boson theory or social event, also called the big brother effect in spacetime as imagined by Brian Greene and his infinite catching parallel worlds

The big Higgs boson theory or social event, also called the big brother effect in spacetime as imagined by Brian Greene and his infinite catching parallel worlds:

Warning. This is a personal test of imagination. Nothing you read in here or try to imagine is true. Real. It’s only my own fiction character. I remember that, as a kid, my favorite tv show was a sf series called the twilight zone. For me that was like bringing the skies down to earth. I really really enjoined it. So don’t try this alone, especially at home, at midnight, when it’s raining outside. You should see the tv series first. It’s freaking you out already because “they control the transmission” on all frequency lengths. It can cause you addiction problems. You could be going crazy. :)

Yeah, and also this is a test thinking experiment addressed to all kids around the world, a test especially focused on waves, all kinds of material waves, including music and quantum waves mechanics. All in one piece. So kids, go outside, see the waves of the sea, feel the waves of air, watch the waves of light, let your parents explain to you how radio signals works out loud music to grasp some of that quantum mechanics, and ask yourselves: when I observe waves in nature, do I really see a constant waving effect of spacetime substance, a weak unstable reality which can’t hold as true because it is at constant entropic collapse, or do I really see some waves behaving as solids therefore adding more physical mass to our reality? Do you see parallel worlds or do you see a waving reality manifesting within our reality? Electromagnetic gravity? Maybe? A potential theoretic cumulative substance highly reactive to primary electric and magnetic stimuli that have been carried out directly and only by massless particles traveling at light speed inside a vacuum? By giving it physical excitement, using similar rates of energy exchange with the Higgs field, therefore sharing its mechanical blueprint or architecture, this new electromagnetic substance made entirely of quantum waves can boost the mechanics of yet another curving surface, like gravity, which can easily describe the new quantum world as Newtonian reversed mechanics or inverse gravitational horizon.

Alter all, waves are waves and particles are particles, you don’t mess waves with particles under the same equation. You use a 2 set equation, one for particle inside the wave and one for particle outside the wave. And let’s not forget that quantum waves could share all, like gravity, a single particle candidate. And that blows, I think, string theory by now.

The theory is also about big stig. They say these days his gravitational pull did some pretty nasty tides somewhere in the world. :)

Hold on a minute. Ok. Ready. And I’m in my zone, scene, screen, puppet act, theatre play, all the diverse personalities learned during life time experience ones which could buildup some architecture of mind by varying across the brain some waves some diverse pieces of greater memory constructs, the thinking about thinking about thinking about as many times you have to repeat yourself to learn your own intellectual act, classified file, selective Darwinian gene, virtual memory, actives or activities (financial or resource founding solutions) of mind, dear old memories which eventually makes us who we really feel we are, or at least believe. And lets stop here at our psychological profile. It knows you better than you think you know yourself. Even if you can’t discover it mentally. So yeah, I think I’m in my mind right, about, now. Perfect.

So I wonder, does Brian Greene have kids? Let’s pick one. Let’s say he has a little girl. I want to imagine I take them both on a wild ride of my deepest exposure of mind, some creative ideas that they have never ever dreamed of experiencing one day into the future.

So I imagine Brian Greene one day taking his kid not to school but in the test field. So they share a perfect sunny stand next to a great sea, relaxing and having a serious chat. And you know what’s coming up. The problem asked to be solved is, exactly, String theory. Parallel real dimensions. Physical systems which could probably be guided by physical math, like us. So Brian Greene asks like me: look at nature and tell me what you think you see? Do you think waves are parallel physical dimensions or do you think that there are simply more waves and more gravity and we just don’t have any clue of how to measure it?

So, because I imagine it, I can also step into its shoes, and imagine I’m next to them and helping the little girl. To Brian’s surprise, we both agree that we think we actually see quantum waves being bent like gravity by something we don’t know, and something which definitely has no physical mass involvement. And then we conclude that quantum frequencies are so many and so intense across the vacuum field that they can actually hide (camouflage) completely any particle inside some virtual distortion (liquid) of relative nature and you are actually inclined to shoot another particle at it to cancel the invisibility cloak. Then we also conclude that when opening a stable wormhole event in spacetime geometry using two similar mechanical fields: general relativity and a general unified field of quantum waves, and if Brian Greene steps into the actual physical wormhole which works mechanically like a black hole, then he will be surprised first to find out that he can only slip into the tunnel at constant light speed or be instantly teleported to its new location. To create a wormhole location event you need a functional gravitational tornado which twists quantum waves and opens up like a cone. But the location is still within the physical range of our universe. So even if you’re in use of infinite speed, you still can’t evade your physical reality using a classical wormhole theory. Or can you. Now we imagine we shoot a wormhole tunnel which goes outside the universe and on the other side of all things. The question is now: could two childish minds shoot out of this world the physical body of Brian Greene? Like in a new location of spacetime where there’s nothing and he could build his own theory? Guess not.

So we’re still in this universe, so far, and, you know, just because string theory still sounds better even at this time, Brian Greene simply asks for us to determine the exact science of black holes. How do you build the time machine? He asks. And we look at each other, and, suddenly I have this crazy idea. I mean, if you’re gravity, if you’re relative spacetime substance and you want to create a black hole inside of you, to create nothing inside of you, then how do you do it in the first place? Assuming nothing is described by vacuum energy then you must find a mechanical solution to isolate a given volume of vacuum energy inside a symmetric volume of relative spacetime. So first you have to cut off all relative communications with the exterior by creating an event horizon disk which can hold inside, keep your head up, zero quantum mechanics and zero Newtonian-relative mechanics. If you have paid good attention here, it’s easy to see that we only need two rudimentary tools to build a time machine: we need a Planck stable diameter of gravitational nature to permanently measure the curvature of the singularity event (singularity meaning zero relative force and zero quantum force), and then we need a Planck wheel or Planck-hawking wheel based mechanism which can become something like a physical spinning horizon of no return. Assuming the event horizon works like a super conductive quantum field based on levitation principle, then the device could become stable enough to sustain a singularity engine.

And now the big Higgs boson comes into play and states that the entire physical volume of a singularity is actually nothing, a huge giant hole which preserves energy at minimum entropic state, and therefore a black hole becomes overnight one gigantic Higgs boson floating in midair. But let’s not forget one important lesson in science: if we can create in theory a physical particle (solid field) using only vacuum energy or Planck mechanics, then such theoretic particle predates a conventional Higgs boson invention, meaning it was created before the Higgs field emerged as particle derivatives, resulting that there is new evidence suggesting some new physical mass which is measured differently than conventional mass. So add more gravity, add dark matter to the equation of black holes and you might have a big Higgs satisfying result.

Despite all the intellectual efforts invested in ourselves to explain singularities and time travel devices Brian Greene looks at us in a red giant sunset and concludes: ok kids, I’ll buy you some cakes tomorrow if you also describe to me the special observer case in quantum theory. And guess what. We accept his final challenge. I’m gonna be eating a lot of cakes tomorrow. Remember there’s a lot of quantum waves waving around, shielding in particles, changing the particle’s position inside a vacuum according to its electromagnetic charge, creating some liquid gravitational sea shells or sea wave, around. Well, when someone shoots an already measured particle to meet a particle which was not measured, then the bullet particle always creates (opens) a gravitational cone (corridor) in the fabric of quantum waves, allowing you to see, like watching through a quantum telescope, the hidden speeding particle which happens to pass right in front of your gravitational hole. So only after the physical collision takes place the gravitational loop also closes in and you loose track of both candidates. And that’s just my story tell. Kids, imagine more quantum theories, imagine more waves, more particles, more gravity. I think it’s better than infinite worlds.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The entropy of time?

The entropic profile of time:

To me, time looks more like the solution to an equation rather than its solving steps. I mean, if you know the math you obviously know the solving steps. So you don’t need to override them, you only need to change the income of the equation to obtain its new outcome. So when you step into the shoes of time, it’s like suddenly becoming interested in two things: where you start and where you finish an idea regardless of its mechanical nature. A good catch is if all ideas share a unified field of mechanics that once understood you’re willing to never forget. So, if I’m time, I don’t need to know the profile of space every time I test a new theory of spatial dimensions as long as they behave within a minimum symmetry according to a unique mechanical act or mathematical text.

If traveling closer to light speed inside a vacuum while directly related to relative time (physical mass) one encounters a potential infinite Zeno sub-divisible set of mathematical solutions to its quantum mechanical behavior (randomness), then time becomes a mathematical construct which has a general entropic profile rather than being a local event which can be freely manipulated, like space. So it appears that time uses the aria of any given spatial dimension rather than its volume. And entropy is what connects the mechanics of space with the solutions of time. So it’s like space measures a given volume while time measures it’s related aria surface. If you relate space to a single photon, time becomes its mathematical halo inside a vacuum. This means that as one travels forward in time (encountering only future events), time opens all possible mathematical solutions to its related minimum entropic system (quantum mechanics) which is relative to physical speed. The faster you travel in relation to light speed the more spatial equations (dimensions) and therefore spatial movement you control via time. If someone travels back in time, the aria of time (mathematical solutions) closes in relation to its minimum entropy which is directly associated with the time traveler location in spacetime. The translation for time travel science states that when traveling backwards in time one will travel closer to its related quantum field always, inevitably measuring it and inevitably changing it, and when jumping into the future (using Zeno curvature or Bohr rings) one will always encounter all mathematical solutions which are related to its minimum entropy. If time projects a closing and opening entropic loop effect in spatial geometry, then according to Zeno paradox, the further away you appear to travel in time without violating light speed the more you’re in control of your absolute entropy therefore quantum particles controlling their past physical location the more they jump towards a given future event. So you can’t have a past physical location in spacetime if you don’t have a given future entropy of that given event. This predicts that at the same time we live in our relative past we also have some future-past entropy which evolves at the same rate we do. The crazy conclusion is that if time would not posses a backwards vector door (arrow) then we would not be able to evolve as entropy would not exist.

Because time events shares similarities with gravitational substance, thermodynamic conductivity, and mathematical inflation, then a backwards arrow of time coincide with a given collapse or decay rate inside any of the mentioned fields. To collapse a gravitational field you have to collapse its conductive mass, to collapse a thermodynamic system you need to do a quantum measurement, and to collapse a mathematical system you need to change its income equation. To collapse the entropy of time you simply need to change your speed and orientation. In quantum theory time collapse rates coincides with particle spin and wave interference while in general relativity time collapse rates coincides with Newtonian mechanics.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The freedom of imagining about gravity

The freedom of having an opened gravitational effect in nature:

The best way to look at Gravity is free will, the freedom effect, the general mechanical effect. So, if you don’t imagine gravity as a limited local effect that only happens in nature under special engineered particles called gravitons, then things become completely weird in nature. If you suddenly imagine that any given gravitational effect produces some special geometry which suddenly becomes architecture that can be reproduced in all other physical systems governed by entropic principles or entropic subdivided software profiles, then gravity becomes a mechanical quality (property) and not a mechanical unique physical force anymore. And this idea changes the equation or the search of science completely.

If gravity is physical property and not physical force, then everywhere in nature someone looks, someone also spots or observe mechanical waves of any type, therefore immediately realizing that one have found a new gravitational field. And that’s the most powerful gravitational effect one can imagine in nature. I think.

So we have just discovered only the gravitational physical effect which is directly related to physical mass. But why should the bending of spacetime be only related or restricted to physical mass? In theory, spacetime curvature should apply to all particles that have physical geometry, including particle carriers or particle energies which shares zero mass as long as there’s some special spacetime curvature which responds only to carried electromagnetic stimulus (current). So, if the quantum field shares a wide variety of unstable (fluctuating) quantum waves which curves directly under electric and magnetic impulses, then it means that electromagnetism suddenly has his own distinct gravitational system or special spacetime curvature made entirely of quantum waves which spreads across the vacuum freely at light speed. So, inside any given quantum field, you can easily predict that you will always find the edge of a relative lake at the edge of light speed. That is where the first wave vibrations (wave associated particles) are born and eventually destroyed, decayed, cancelled completely. And not only electromagnetic force but also strong and weak force should have distinct wave frequencies, or wave lengths, or distinct curvatures which works unified under a given general malleable field to sustain a gravitational event horizon which keeps together and functional particle mechanical acts. Maybe that’s why all particles have energy halos?

If quantum waves truly create a general field of gravitational distortion under constant electric and magnetic stress, if electromagnetism has his own distinct gravitational pattern (field), then there should be a new candidate particle which can only sustain all wave mechanics and never create stuff like physical particles unless they have zero mass. If quantum waves have their own particle carrier, then all quantum forces should be manipulating it in order to exist maybe by indirectly interacting with physical mass.

And the idea is that electromagnetic gravity waves through quantum and relative spacetime at the same rate and at the same time with classical gravity without disrupting one another directly, only indirectly. There are waves within the waves. Where they communicate indirectly there should be hints of quantum forces. So, in some sense, you can say that general relativity and quantum theory can’t be unified under the same physical force but rather under the same mechanical act (principle) which undoubtedly becomes the descriptive geometry of any functional entropic engine that can be created inside a vacuum at any given constant speed. Just as conventional gravity works with mass, electromagnetic gravity could work inversely related to mass, being highly receptive to massless geometry.

This means that, in the end, all physical geometry could be hollowed, empty, because all the information that reality can provide us can be simulated inside a special relative field, a field of zero spacetime curvature. You can also say that, eventually, light speed holds (preserves) everything that the universe has to offer in time or further away in relation to our physical position because the first law which came into physical existence could have been a random constant speed. The paradox of physical measurement is that we will never ever succeed in measuring such mathematical randomness that was somehow instantly attributed to the Big Bang effect (equation). If the equation is simple enough to self manifest without the usage of an advanced intellect or physical brain, then the universe simply has no creator as it represents a creation itself. If not, then you are allowed to travel in infinite physical parallel dimensions. So you have to ask yourself: how simple is the entropic principle which governs any mechanical field? Could it be energy efficiency the answer? Could all scientific events be governed by selective information or natural selection?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why infinity is not an efficient law which can sustain our reality?

Why infinity is not a functional mathematical law able to start a universe:

Say you have nothing and you try imagining of how to create mechanically a universe. Each time you start with an infinite law, regardless of its nature, you’ll observe to your surprise that your law will never bind another mechanical law because it constantly grows unpredictably. So following such basic logic, you realize you need to start with something limited, a mechanical solution like the plank field, and then allow to the positive-negative motion to evolve infinitely. This means that our universe can evolve at infinite rate as long as the system which is governed by all our physical laws allows it to happen. The paradox is that the universe was in the first place created with a constant speed which is the equivalence of the universe as being permanently engineered inside a light speed dimension which has constant zero curvature.

Also I read great news today. Quantum entanglements apply to more than binary systems. This could lead to a theory of multiple quantum entanglements which points out that eventually any quantum equation can be fully contained and entangled, resulting the great physical fall of uncertainty principle, allowing us to proudly measure anytime the location of the particle as long as the field of quantum waves behaves like a gravitational substance receptive only to electric and magnetic stimuli, and not to physical mass. Great job done today.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The psychological profile of possible Aliens which physically controls the Galaxy. At least. As imagined by the mind of Lawrence Krauss. And the aliens should also know the theory of everything.

The psychological profile of possible Aliens which physically controls the Galaxy. At least. As imagined by the mind of Lawrence Krauss. And the aliens should also know the theory of everything.

In order to proceed, we have to carefully choose a basic theoretic description of the human mind. A theory which can physically describe all human brains. A definition of human memories or mechanical parameters of thinking.

Let’s try the mind of Lawrence k. This time. The great mind of the professor. :)

So, one day, the professor is asked from the audience:

According to your scientific cows, how do you describe the human mind, I mean, the general field of the mind, not alternative decaying systems, unstable or unsustainable memories?

As Lawrence k would say, it is easily to explain to you the volume of an expending cow. :) but now look at a dolphin, not a cow this time. Look at the dolphin brain. The brain has neural mechanical processes which describes some physical phenomena which are all controlled in science and nature by evolving systems which are always in control by the entropy of the system. Always. Even if its gravitational or electromagnetic or biological or any other descriptive functional mathematical field in nature which can only collapse at specific measurements, which is not like quantum mechanics. And that’s a big problem. But anyways, you don’t need to know what entropy is, you just need to understand that it is physically controlling you. So my scientific cows becomes now your thoughts, your working mind which subdivides in short and long transmissions of memories, reconfigurable bits of information. So, just like my cows explodes, when the entropy of volume memory overcomes the entropy of aria memory or vice versa, the short term intellectual computation or long therm intellectual computation collapses because there’s more entropic logic formulated in short term centers than coming from long therm centers inside the network of the brain or vice versa, and the human mind happens to forget stuff. And it can forget anything as long as it can remember anything that comes in the form of new information downloaded using external sources or sensors. And now my cows makes you a robot profile. :)

The stranger from the audience is not satisfied with answer, also they say he’s actually a machine who’s asking questions, and asks again:

So who are the smartest aliens then?

And Lawrence replies: your scientific cows assumes there’s scientific cows living in all other things, suggesting a unified field theory. And therefore all physical theories should point one mechanical profile which can be read or discovered in all potential physical fields. So, a theory of everything stands true as any Darwinian-Newtonian-quantum field of mechanics which can vary across its randomness depending on the nature of the field, which is always of electromagnetic nature. Always. So how could gravity be or behave electromagnetic? Maybe using other parental physical fields, like dark matter? Or maybe through the unified field of quantum waves? What physicists across the world define as “the physical parallel dimension”. I personally don’t buy that. I mean, what would you prefer? A theory of everything, a new curving physical substance like gravity which is of spacetime nature, or some imaginary parallel infinite definite and mathematical never ending dreams? You know what they say: go mathematics or go insane when dealing with infinity. “Is infinity a person?” Asks the stranger again. And the story goes like this: Lawrence told the man that if aliens would abduct him he would really really find out how smart they are and how they describe the personality of infinity. And then he finished by telling the never ending theory of no God and no religion.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Does the entropy of 3d space depend on the entropy of 2d space?

Does the entropy of 3d space depend on the entropy of 2d space? Are they equivalent? Does the complexity of 2d space depend on the complexity of 1d space? Do binary quantum theory project geometric entropy which projects inflationary complexity as 1-2-3 dimensional transcendence into the mechanics of spacetime? And if you have only binary particle symmetry at your disposal, how do you create complex theories?

Imagine you take a slice of 3d spacetime and that particular slice is considered to be a 2d sheet of spacetime which has Planck length across. In theory, even if it’s one Planck length across, the entropy of 2d quantum space is still no less complex than the entropy of 3d quantum space. So theoretically speaking, even a human brain could be simulated as a Planck slice of active tissue. You would simply have less neural synapses and less to think of. If quantum waves are situated in spacetime in between the particle’s velocity and light speed, pointing a given waving distortion in spacetime which excites smoothly the limit of spacetime, then it means that energy particles travels at the same rate with their wave counterpart while massive particles travels at different rates in relation to their wave counterparts. The wave is always in front of the massive particle connecting the particle with light speed in equivalence to negative time, time which runs back, conducting energy through the wave and directly into the particle, generating a certain elasticity of spacetime that starts with physical mass or Archimedes flotation principle. When two symmetric or asymmetric particles collide, their waves also cancels themselves before the particles make physical contact or exactly when they make physical contact in case of photons. So if heavy particles behave similar to sailing ships on water, but only this time the water waves spread in the direction of motion across the water surface at light speed and decreasing in intensity with distance, then massless particles behaves like electrons appearing to orbit their waves. So if the wave of a heavy particle points out where its future location might be in relation to light speed, the wave of a massless particle points out where the particle might have been. If the fabric of waves is similar to the fabric of gravity, sharing the same elastic property but reacting differently, only to electromagnetic interaction, then fluctuating waves becomes similar to spacetime gravitational distortions but this time such distortions are too weak to affect particle mechanics resulting they affect only vacuum energy issuing out Casimir tides over vacuum seas. So it appears that electromagnetism has its own gravitational theory, and such theory is expressed as quantum waves. If waves are distortions in spacetime and if spacetime curves around particles as they travel inside a vacuum, then electromagnetic bending of spacetime easily explains the double slit experiment if you imagine that all particles are hidden inside an electromagnetic cloud. So only when two particles collide and their waves cancels one is allowed to observe the physical particles. Complex quantum structures tend to permanently cancel particle waves as particles are forced to stay together in close relation. Because mass is irrelevant to electromagnetic distortion in spacetime and because the electromagnetic bending of spacetime is only relevant to light speed and particle diameter, then some particles should not cancel completely their waves, they should be able to keep few gravitational rings around them making them appear bigger than they truly are. For example, if an electron hits a photon, the electron will keep some of its electromagnetic cloud. If two electrons hits, then they will cancel all their electromagnetic cloud. So could actually quantum waves describe the gravitational field of electromagnetism?

If waves can be associated with 2d quantum space and with parallel dimensions, then even if a dimension is flat it’s no less complex than our reality.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The time traveler smile paradox

The time traveler smile paradox:

Time travel science is not weird, it is the best thing one can imagine. It is imagination at physical work which allows you to create new ideas at infinite rates, always. Nature is not weird, we are weird because we can’t understand its mechanical principles.

First let’s put some mechanical ideas into perspective. Time as described in relative fields defines a physical vector of gravitational nature which always pushes towards all potential future states (the future being identified as all possible mathematical combinations within a measured field) following the heaviest gravitational distortion in spacetime always. So the heavier you are the more selective you become with future time events. So time pushes against light speed and light speed pushes back because time is not allowed to reach the speed of light. So time pushes back and light speed pushes against it every time you think of that idea. Eventually time is canceled or reduced to a static frequency which points out that the closer you get to light speed the more disconnected and parallel space becomes. And that’s where you find parallel waves or parallel dimensions. And quantum mechanics becomes completely different in relation to general relativity because in quantum mechanics all things travels really really fast disconnecting the fluidity of all spacetime substances. Because quantum time is mediated by a static wave or disconnected region of spacetime which multiplies as you accelerate inside a vacuum and collapses when decelerating, then it means that quantum probability becomes relative to the length and number of disconnected regions of spacetime within a given quantum equation. Also the collapse of quantum time from a static wave to a fluid state points out the transition between a quantum field and a relative field. You can also imagine that relative time has a “hot” thermodynamic property while quantum time has a “cold” thermodynamic property. So what do you do with a disconnected region of spacetime that shares static time? How do you resolve the equation? You apply quantum entanglement to regain communications instantly and keep spacetime uncertain but apparently unified. This points out that all quantum equations share two basic qualities: disconnected regions of spacetime governed by quantum entanglements and fluctuating waves of parallel spaces measuring zero time or instant particle manifest. Now, because relative time can’t reach the speed of light, then a photon has no physical interaction with fluid time and only with static time therefore the photon living independently from relative spacetime events. This blank thought tells me that a photon do not posses the physical ability to observe time, therefore it only observes disconnected space. At light speed space is permanently disconnected and layered in parallel dimensions or alternative worlds. So at the speed of light time vectors disappears completely from the equation and relative time merges with relative space completely such as you can’t tell any difference between space and time. So the only way to measure time rates or physical events at the speed of light is through quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement becomes a new mechanical framework in the fabric of light speed transforming parallel space into a faster than light experience. Quantum entanglement science also points out that faster then light speed events becomes inversely related to relative spacetime, therefore entangled measurements becoming equivalent to backwards time travel. This means that beyond the speed of light things appear to flow in reverse in order to measure past time or relative time in relation to potential infinite happening events. So the equation of spacetime turns upside down and now the speed of light becomes a basic spatial construct of disconnected regions while teleportation becomes a common time event or a new speed limit relative to multiple points connections within light segments. Related to light speed, quantum entanglement becomes a new infinite speed which can transfer energy between two or more points (photons) at infinite rates (multiple time events happening at once) using only math to describe physical location. So the physical terrain of parallel worlds is now made of photons instead of material stuff. You can say it feels like you physically walk on photons when you get out of your imaginary time machine and light can’t catch up with you because you walk faster in relation to it.

And now let’s start the thought experiment:

It’s not necessarily important to enter a black hole to gain access to parallel dimensions, you just need to imagine you become infinite just like that. So if I imagine I have a time machine which can sustain my physical body only in quantum entanglement events just like that, then I become the only stable object traveling faster than light speed while the rest appears a constant decaying wave event. When I step out of my imaginary time machine, into the real world, reality appears to me as being made only of unstable events or gravitational waves which passes by at gravitational rates or at relative motion (spin). So it means that I have to wait for a while in order to observe a relative event. With each passing gravitational event or density wave, the entire physical reality reconfigures itself to signal changes in the field expressed as relative motion. Things which moves slower reconfigures last and things which moves faster reconfigures first. So everything appears transparent to me, something you call preserved information in time, and I can only see physical objects as they truly are only when gravitational waves scans them using quantum and relative spacetime properties. So, from my visual perspective, reality behaves first quantum and then relative. To walk physically, I also need to jump on passing gravitational waves. So I have to be careful not to fall into parallel voids of spacetime. Because I live now inside a Planck dimension directly related to general relativity, not only that I have to wait longer than the lifetime of the physical universe to see your smile, but as I physically move in relation to you, I create more entangled connections, meaning I travel further away from you in time even if I only circle your physical location in spacetime. So the more I walk the longer it takes to see your smile. Because earth gravitational waves passes by very slow in relation to my infinite physical location, the only physical terrain which could keep me from not falling through relative spacetime is a black hole. On the surface of a black hole there are gravitational waves passing regularly within almost the length of light speed. But as I jump from one another, the length of light speed appears to dilate in relation to my physical jump. So, not only that it’s impossible for me to stand next to you, but the smile paradox is that if, in theory, I stand in front of you as a time traveler and we both smile at the same relative-quantum time rate, it would take an infinite amount of time for you to see my smile and for me to see yours. Also, the crazy idea is that all parallel dimensions or alternative worlds which are related to our physical existence moves at inflationary rates away from us in time even if they pass right through us. So the conclusion is that if relative spacetime moves at Hubble rate away from us then quantum spacetime moves at inflationary rate away from us through the use of quantum entanglement events.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment